August 16, 2010

Some Advice from Advertising Legend Albert Lasker

ALBERT LASKER WAS ONE OF THE PIONEERS OF THE AMERICAN ADVERTISING INDUSTRY AND ONE OF THE MOST FASCINATING BUSINESSMEN IN OUR HISTORY. MR. LASKER WAS THE INNOVATOR OF MANY THINGS THAT WE TAKE FOR GRANTED IN ADVERTISING AS WE KNOW IT TODAY IN THE EARLY 1900’S, AT LORD & THOMAS, HIS AGENCY WHICH WAS THE LARGEST IN THE WORLD AT THE TIME. HE WAS ASKED TO HIRE TO HIS DAUGHTER, MARY LASKER, AND HE AGREED RELUCTANTLY AT A MODEST SALARY OF $30.00 A WEEK. HE DECIDED THAT THE BEST ACTION WAS TO KEEP HIS DISTANCE FROM HIS NEWEST EMPLOYEE. HE DID, HOWEVER, LEAVE A NOTE ON HER DESK ON HER FIRST DAY AT WORK, OCTOBER 29, 1935 AND HERE IS THE LETTER:


“MY DARLING MARY, WELCOME TO LORD & THOMAS. I HOPE WE HAVE A LONG BUSINESS ASSOCIATION TOGETHER—IF WE DO, WE WILL BOTH GET MUCH JOY FROM IT.


BOTH AS FATHER AND EMPLOYER I GIVE YOU THIS ADVICE—TRY TO LEARN FROM EVERYONE (HIGH AND LOW), TRY TO BE OF SERVICE TO EVERY ONE (HIGH AND LOW). HE FINALLY LEADS WHO FIRST LEARNS TO SERVE. AND REMEMBER—WE SPEND OUR LIVES LEARNING. ABOVE ALL, BE YOURSELF—YOUR BEST SELF. ALWAYS THINK OF THE OTHER FELLOW’S VIEWPOINT AND TRY TO GET HIM TO THINK OF YOURS. LEARN TO WALK BEFORE YOU RUN. BELIEVE IN YOURSELF—AND BELIEVING, STRIVE TO LEARN EVERY DAY AND GROW CREATIVELY EVERY MINUTE SO THAT YOU WILL JUSTIFY YOUR BELIEF.

ALL MY LOVE, FATHER”

August 11, 2010

We are Broke

From Larry Kotlikoff:

‘Unofficial’ Liabilities

Based on the CBO’s data, I calculate a fiscal gap of $202 trillion, which is more than 15 times the official debt. This gargantuan discrepancy between our “official” debt and our actual net indebtedness isn’t surprising. It reflects what economists call the labeling problem. Congress has been very careful over the years to label most of its liabilities “unofficial” to keep them off the books and far in the future.

For example, our Social Security FICA contributions are called taxes and our future Social Security benefits are called transfer payments. The government could equally well have labeled our contributions “loans” and called our future benefits “repayment of these loans less an old age tax,” with the old age tax making up for any difference between the benefits promised and principal plus interest on the contributions.

The fiscal gap isn’t affected by fiscal labeling. It’s the only theoretically correct measure of our long-run fiscal condition because it considers all spending, no matter how labeled, and incorporates long-term and short-term policy.

$4 Trillion Bill

How can the fiscal gap be so enormous?

Simple. We have 78 million baby boomers who, when fully retired, will collect benefits from Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid that, on average, exceed per-capita GDP. The annual costs of these entitlements will total about $4 trillion in today’s dollars. Yes, our economy will be bigger in 20 years, but not big enough to handle this size load year after year.

This is what happens when you run a massive Ponzi scheme for six decades straight, taking ever larger resources from the young and giving them to the old while promising the young their eventual turn at passing the generational buck.

Herb Stein, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under U.S. President Richard Nixon, coined an oft-repeated phrase: “Something that can’t go on, will stop.” True enough. Uncle Sam’s Ponzi scheme will stop. But it will stop too late.

And it will stop in a very nasty manner. The first possibility is massive benefit cuts visited on the baby boomers in retirement. The second is astronomical tax increases that leave the young with little incentive to work and save. And the third is the government simply printing vast quantities of money to cover its bills.

Worse Than Greece

Most likely we will see a combination of all three responses with dramatic increases in poverty, tax, interest rates and consumer prices. This is an awful, downhill road to follow, but it’s the one we are on. And bond traders will kick us miles down our road once they wake up and realize the U.S. is in worse fiscal shape than Greece.

Some doctrinaire Keynesian economists would say any stimulus over the next few years won’t affect our ability to deal with deficits in the long run.

This is wrong as a simple matter of arithmetic. The fiscal gap is the government’s credit-card bill and each year’s 14 percent of GDP is the interest on that bill. If it doesn’t pay this year’s interest, it will be added to the balance.

Demand-siders say forgoing this year’s 14 percent fiscal tightening, and spending even more, will pay for itself, in present value, by expanding the economy and tax revenue.

My reaction? Get real, or go hang out with equally deluded supply-siders. Our country is broke and can no longer afford no- pain, all-gain “solutions.”

August 9, 2010

Samuel Rutherford on Adversity

Dr. George Grant posted this amazing and succinct passage from the 17th Century Scottish theologian Samuel Rutherford:

”I hope to over-hope and over-believe any troubles.”

“Grace withereth without adversity.”

“I see grace groweth best in winter.”

“Your rock doth not ebb and flow--but your sea.”

“I know no sweeter way to Heaven than free grace and hard trials together.”

“Dry wells send us to the Fountain.”

August 5, 2010

Visualizing Our New Health Care Industry

Why Mitch Should Run

From the Politico:

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, now on the back nine of his tenure in Indianapolis, is still supporting very strong approval ratings despite the economic downturn.

The Indiana political newsletter
Howey Politics has a GOP-conducted poll from late last month showing 65 percent of Hoosiers approve of Daniels and just 28 perce t disapprove.

Deeper in the numbers, Daniels' enduring popularity is even more striking. Fifty-six percent of self-identified Obama supporters approve of the Republican governor and potential White House candidate while 36 percent of them disapprove.

The survey was conducted by Christine Matthews, who has polled for Daniels in the past.

Laffer on Taxes

From a recent WSJ article by Nashville resident and tax expert Art Laffer:

Since 1978, the U.S. has cut the highest marginal earned-income tax rate to 35% from 50%, the highest capital gains tax rate to 15% from about 50%, and the highest dividend tax rate to 15% from 70%. President Clinton cut the highest marginal tax rate on long-term capital gains from the sale of owner-occupied homes to 0% for almost all home owners. We've also cut just about every other income tax rate as well.

During this era of ubiquitous tax cuts, income tax receipts from the top 1% of income earners rose to 3.3% of GDP in 2007 (the latest year for which we have data) from 1.5% of GDP in 1978. Income tax receipts from the bottom 95% of income earners fell to 3.2% of GDP from 5.4% of GDP over the same time period. (See the nearby chart).

These results shouldn't be surprising. The highest tax bracket income earners, when compared with those people in lower tax brackets, are far more capable of changing their taxable income by hiring lawyers, accountants, deferred income specialists and the like. They can change the location, timing, composition and volume of income to avoid taxation.


August 4, 2010

Horses Ass

I usually hate group forwards, but I thought the one below sent to me by my dad was pretty classic:

Railroad tracks.

The US standard railroad gauge (distance between the rails) is 4 feet, 8.5 inches. That's an exceedingly odd number.


Why was that gauge used? Because that's the way they built them in England, and English expatriates designed the US railroads.


Why did the English build them like that? Because the first rail lines were built by the same people who built the pre-railroad tramways, and that's the gauge they used.


Why did 'they' use that gauge then? Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they had used for building wagons, which used that wheel spacing.


Why did the wagons have that particular odd wheel spacing? Well, if they tried to use any other spacing, the wagon wheels would break on some of the old, long distance roads in England, because that's the spacing of the wheel ruts.



So who built those old rutted roads? Imperial Rome built the first long distance roads in Europe (including England ) for their legions. Those roads have been used ever since.



And the ruts in the roads? Roman war chariots formed the initial ruts, which everyone else had to match for fear of destroying their wagon wheels.

Since the chariots were made for Imperial Rome, they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing. Therefore the United States standard railroad gauge of 4 feet, 8.5 inches is derived from the original specifications for an Imperial Roman war chariot. Bureaucracies live forever.



So the next time you are handed a specification/procedure/process and wonder 'What horse's ass came up with this?' , you may be exactly right. Imperial Roman army chariots were made just wide enough to accommodate the rear ends of two war horses. (Two horses' asses.)

Now, the twist to the story:


When you see a Space Shuttle sitting on its launch pad, there are two big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main fuel tank. These are solid rocket boosters, or SRBs. The SRBs are made by Thiokol at their factory in Utah

The
engineers who designed the SRBs would have preferred to make them a bit fatter, but the SRBs had to be shipped by train from the factory to the launch site. The railroad line from the factory happens to run through a tunnel in the mountains, and the SRBs had to fit through that tunnel. The tunnel is slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad track, as you now know, is about as wide as two horses' behinds.


So, a major Space Shuttle design feature of what is arguably the world's most advanced transportation system was determined over two thousand years ago by the width of a horse's ass. And you thought being a horse's ass wasn't important? Ancient horse's asses control almost everything... while

CURRENT


Horses Asses in Washington are controlling everything else.

Moving Picture of Unemployment

A pretty fascinating look at the unemployment picture:

Chart of the Day